Planning applications in TQ5

Installation of doors to an existing single storey extension to the rear elevation.

1x Pittosporum - Coppice at approximately 2.0 metres from ground level, pruning back to suitable growth points to encourage vigorous regenerative growth and the development of a healthy new crown structure.

5 Day Notice T1 - Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris) - Fell to ground level. Entirely dead. Dead crown, no live foliage and clear evidence of total physiological failure. Retain the stump. No stump grinding as this would risk damaging the roots of neighbouring Scots Pines of the same species.

Formation of single-storey rear extension.

Formation of single storey side extension.

5 Day Notice - Fell - Dead Spruce Tree located on driveway of property.

T1, T2, T4 - Austrian pine - prune trees as specified in the accompanying report. T3 Austrian pine - fell.

Various works: alterations to window size (front and rear), removal of garage and formation of new habitable room, removal of conservatory and formation of new habitable room, remove existing rear dormer and replace with larger flat roof dormer, removal of chimney and side windows, formation of new open porch to principal elevation.

T1 - Willow - remove - necessary as the tree is growing close to house and power lines

Formation of dormer to front and rear & internal alterations.

Replacement of cladding.

Beech T2 specifications 1) Reduce the sides of the southern, western and northwestern aspects of the crown by 2-3m with a 100mm maximum cut diameter. This northwestern crown radius will reduce from approximately 7m to 5m. The southern crown radius will reduce from approximately 7m to 5m. The western crown radius will reduce from approximately 14m to 11m. 2) Remove the lowest limb in the southern crown - approximately 200mm in diameter Beech T2 reason for works (Tree report must be read) Previous root disturbance is suspected - potentially destabilising the rooting system. The tree has a significant crown bias to the west. Pruning will reduce the loading on the root system and therefore reduce the likelihood of it uprooting. Tree stands within falling distance to parking. The lowest limb is struck by delivery vehicles, there are limited options for branch reduction. Beech T3 specifications 1) Reduce the sides of the northern, eastern and southern crown aspects by 2.5m ? use a 100mm maximum cut diameter. The crown radius will reduce from approximately 8m to 5.5m. 2) Reduce the top of the tree by 1.5m - use a 75mm maximum cut diameter. The height of the tree will reduce from approximately 19.5m to 18m. Beech T3 reason for works (Tree report must be read) The base of the main stem is decayed. Pruning will reduce bending load and torsional load on the stem base and reduce the likelihood of stem failure. The tree stands within falling distance to the neighbour's house.

Please refer to plan no: 2015.001 - T4 Maple tree for position reference + identification information We wish to request permission for a professional tree surgeon to create a light crown lift of approx 2 metres removing a small number of secondary branches to maintain a balanced canopy + ground level clearance + selectively reduce lateral spread by no more than 1 metre to retain existing framework whilst reducing footpath overhang + promoting trees' existing form. The intention is to retain trees' natural character + encourage new healthy growth.

G1 - Cypress Suggested Works: Dismantle southernmost tree (closest to residential property) in stages to near ground level, reduce height of remaining two trees by 2 metres, Maximum Diameter of Cuts (MDC) 50mm. Trim all round to shape. Rationale: The southernmost tree of the group is clearly in a declining state - there is dieback in the canopy plus separation between the stems on the southern side. Additionally, the tree is growing within 50cms of the residential property. With limited pruning options available, due to the tree's species and form, and the current state of the tree we believe that the tree is not suitable for retention and removal is the only viable option. Reducing the two remaining trees is to reduce loadings on the newly exposed stems following the removal of the adjacent tree in G1.

Variation of conditions in relation to P/2023/0909 (Variation of Conditions relating to application P/2023/0375: Construction of a one-and-a-half storey dwelling with associated car parking and landscaping. Condition: P1 - Approved Plans. Variation sought: Increase in roof ridge height.): Condition P1 - Approved Plans & Condition 8 - Materials. Variation sought: Changes to elevations, including amendments to rooflight and solar panels to front, eaves height and introduction of chimney, glazed canopy at front, and changes to rear fenestration and side window.

Single storey side (NW) extension to include roof terrace, removal of front (SW) steps and enclose front of property, changes to rear garden and fenestration, and the creation of off-street parking.

We intend to prune our Mimosa Tree at the front of the property to keep it well maintained and prevent it from protruding significantly into the Highway. This also obstructs visibility for those using the courtyard which is a safety concern. Please see image of tree and location plan. NB: Tree is the larger of the two canopies depicted in the front garden on the plans (SE corner). The proposed works consist of a selective crown reduction to the outer extremities of the canopy. It is intended to reduce the length of the overextended branches to approx 1.5-2m from the branch tips equating to an overall reduction of no more than 20-30% of the crown volume.

Oak T1 - Proposed work: Fell. Justification: The tree exhibits a pronounced lean with a restricted rooting environment, resulting in reduced structural stability. Removal is appropriate due to limited long-term retention potential. Natural regeneration is generally expected and seen as a suitable strategy for this species. Oak T2 - Proposed work: Re-coppice to previous points. Justification: Evidence of decay within the lower stem. Re-coppicing helps restore a stable coppice stool and keeps the tree contributing to the hedge structure. Natural regeneration is generally expected and seen as a suitable replacement strategy for this species. Oak T3 - Proposed work: Fell. Justification: Significant lean combined with constrained rooting space, limiting safe future development. Removal is appropriate given the low long-term viability. Natural regeneration is generally expected and seen as a suitable strategy for this species. Oak T4 - Re-coppice to previous points. Justification: Decay is present in the lower stem. Re-coppicing helps restore a stable coppice stool and keeps the tree contributing to the hedge structure. Natural regeneration is generally expected and seen as a suitable replacement strategy for this species. Sycamore T5 - Proposed work: Crown reduction by up to 2m, maintaining natural form. Justification: Works intended to manage crown spread and maintain appropriate clearance while retaining tree health and amenity value. The tree lost its stability and possibly some roots when the neighbouring wall collapsed last year. Oak T6 - Proposed work: Remove the lowest-order branch only. Justification: Minor branch removal required to facilitate access for larger vehicles. The branch is of small diameter with an acceptable 3:1 ratio, and removal will not adversely affect the tree's form or vitality.

Removal of T1 eucalyptus - cutting to main lowest fork. Tree is an old pollard and is showing signs of decay at the base.

The conversion of a ground and first-floor maisonette, along with an upper floor flat, into two townhouses. The proposal also includes extensions to the front of the building and the replacement of the existing mansard roof with a raised pitched roof. Additionally, balconies are proposed to the rear elevation.

Formation of flat roof first floor extension over existing extension at rear to include a juliet balcony.

Deodar cedar has previously been reduced but is now growing over pavements area and over the road work to be carried out dismantle and remove the tree and stump grind out root system home owner wants to plant some smaller more manageable trees in the garden

As detailed by the arborist, George Trott. Ref 6.2 and 6.3 of his report. These are Sycamores. Potentially, with increased storm speeds, two huge tree trunks over my boundary could damage my property.

Certificate of Lawful Development for existing use: establish use as dwellinghouse (use class C3).

Proposed change of use from dwelling to holiday let

The reason for the tree removal request is that the location and size/type of tree are incompatible. The tree is a Mexican Fan Palm which are fast growing, with heights up to 100 feet possible. The tree is located only a few metres from 2 properties, and specifically located adjacent to a main road (Ranscombe Road, a major access road to the Marina/Berry Head) with a raised wall supporting surrounding properties. The tree is already causing issues for a small retaining wall (see photo attached) and the damage to the immediate location will only get worse such that it is believed that removal will inevitably be required at some point, so it makes sense to do this sooner rather than later (thereby reducing impact, cost and technical issues). We have commissioned a review by a professional local company (Advanced Tree Care, Brixham) who have visited the site and clarified that tree management/maintenance options were strictly limited due to the tree type, such that it is only possible to remove dead leaves for appearances rather than control growth. There is another palm tree within a metre of the Fan Palm and the plan is to leave that one, letting it flourish with the improved light such that the visual impact of losing the Fan Palm is diminished over time.

T001 - 1 x Copper beech (Fagus sylvatica purpurea) - Reduce to tree in height from 13m to 11m not exceeding wounds of 75mm, and radial crown spread from 6.5m to 5m not exceeding wounds of 75mm. Crown raise tree to give a maximum clearance of 2.5 metres from the property. Justification for works - The tree has been reduced historically and has responded well resulting in limited amenity loss and a better relationship between tree and property.

Tree 1 - conifer- to be removed as outgrown its position & causing an obstruction. Tree 2 - Crown reduction to approx 12 ft tall & 6 ft wide. Tree 3 - Crown reduction to approx 20ft tall x 10ft wide. There are currently brambles & ivy growing within which makes it look much denser & will be removed. Tree 4 - conifer - It will only be dead branches which will be removed which I realise permission is not required for. So no new picture. Tree 5 - the Pittosporum will require crown reduction. Unfortunately due to its current height & position it is difficult to estimate what the reduction will be to but is still likely approx 20 ft tall & 10ft wide. As can be seen there is a variegated ivy growing up it which will be be removed.

Installation of 20m pole and associated apparatus & removal of existing 12.5m pole and associated apparatus.

G001 - Pine, crown lift to 2.5m above public footpath T002 - Weeping Ash, reduce entire canopy to live growth at 3.5m above ground level Reason for works: The Pine trees have low foliage overhanging the public footpath which needs pruning back. The Weeping Ash is virtually dead with very limited reiterative growth centrally, plenty of adventitious growth around crown break which will be left for continued growth.

T001 Copper beech (Fagus sylvatica purpurea) - Sectionally dismantle and fell. T001 is situated approximately 1.2 metres from the dwelling, with 6?7 metres of canopy overhang, resulting in physical interference with the building, retaining wall damage consistent with root expansion, shading of habitable rooms, and ongoing maintenance burden . Although assessed as a tolerable risk, its retention would require repeated pruning that is considered unsustainable and likely to compromise its long-term form . The report also notes that the tree?s public visibility and wider amenity value are limited, with substantial surrounding tree cover maintaining local character . Replacement planting in a more suitable location within the garden is recommended , ensuring continued tree cover without the existing structural conflict or adverse impact on the enjoyment of the property.

Retention of former detached 'COVID-19 visitor meeting pod' in front garden area. Previously allowed via temporary approvals. The 'meeting pod' is pitched roof garden office/summer house style development. (Retrospective)

Application for approval of details reserved by Condition 4 (Tree Protection) & Informative 3 (BNG) of planning consent 3231/25/FUL

Removal of existing conservatory, Single storey extension to North elevation , Single storey extension to West elevation, including part enclosed passage-breezeway, Single storey extension to East elevation, Increase in size of window on 1st floor East facing elevation, Harmonisation of façade materials and fenestration materials across existing and proposed, Replacement of redish roof tiles with grey roof tiles, Increase parking forecourt area from East drive area.

Application for approval of details reserved by condition 7 (Tree Planting) of planning consent 1658/25/FUL

Ash (T1) - fell because the tree's canopy fails to contribute to the visual amenities that enhance the character and setting of the Conservation Area. A healthy and well-structured canopy is essential for maintaining the aesthetic and ecological value of such areas, providing shade, habitat for wildlife, and visual cohesion with the surrounding landscape.

Two storey hipped roof extension to rear (SW), Single storey monopitch roof extension to side (NW), Single storey hipped rear extension (SW), monopitched porch to front (NE), detached single garage to rear (SW) and enlargement of driveway.

Construction of rear extension with internal alterations to car port.

Subdivision of existing single residential dwelling above existing shop into one bedroom flat and two-bedroom maisonette including extensions to rear NE elevation. Existing shop to be maintained as Class E with changes to façade design, materials and formation of a separate residential entrance. Increase size of existing rear dormer including formation of external balcony.

T1, T2, T3 - Pittosporum - remove, to improve light in garden and to provide sufficient clearance to property

Non-material amendment relating to P/2025/0522. Amendments sought: oriel window reconstruction scaled back to roof alterations only, roof terrace omitted and replaced with juliet balconies, existing rear window replaced with door and juliet balcony.

Monterey Cypress (T1) - Reduce the crown by approximately 2 metres on the eastern side only to correct the developing structural imbalance and to reduce the likelihood of further branch failure, supporting the tree's health and stability. All reduction cuts will be made back to appropriate lateral growth points, and no pruning wound will exceed 50 mm in diameter. All works will be undertaken in accordance with BS3998:2010 - Tree Work Recommendations, ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations. This selective reduction is necessary to maintain the tree's stability, structural integrity, and safety, especially following the recent stem failure and loss of shelter from neighbouring trees.

St Marys Hill: 1:A- group of mixed broadleaf trees between footpath and buildings to crown raise to 3m over footpath and to side prune to achieve 2m clearance from buildings Stmary Hill: 1:E- group of mixed broadleaf trees encroaching on footpath and streetlights. crown raise to 3m over footpath and prune away from street lights and signs St Marys Hill: 1:F- mixed species hedge to be reduced to 1.2m and maintained as hedgerow

T1 European lime Tilia x europaea T1 is a mature lime tree that is growing within close proximity of the neighbouring building (within 1m) due to its size limbs are becoming heavily weighted and more likely to fail. Also large amounts of deadwood and debris regularly fall of the roof. T1 is growing very close to a mature beech tree and starting to affect the shape of the beech tree. I would like to reduce T1 by 20% in order to match the final height of the beech tree adjacent. this will keep the tree safe next to building by removing weight from weighted branches. and keep the aesthetics of the trees growing as one canopy. I would also like to remove the lowest primary overhanging the neighbours roof. T2 Beech Fagus sylvatica T2 is a mature beech tree growing within close proximity of beech lodge and the neighbouring property. I would like to reduce t2 by 30% and reshape as marked it pic 1. this will remove risk from heavily weighted branches failing, and reduce the amount the tree catches the wind in a built up area. reducing the risk of the tree while keeping the tree for the aesthetics of the road. this should be maintained every 5 years on a cyclical basis

Change of use of first and second floors above commercial unit to form 3no. residential apartments, changes to existing shop frontage to create a new shop frontage and new entrance lobby, alterations to fenestration and removal of external steps.

Plan is to pollard T1 (Sycamore) and T2 (Oak) to the height of the larger conifer hedge as shown in marked photo. The primary reason for this work is risk mitigation. A large Ash tree that previously stood directly between T1 and T2 failed a few years ago, falling into the school playground located immediately behind the property. Honey fungus was identified on the failed Ash, indicating the potential for decay and structural weakness in trees of this proximity and species. Pollarding T1 and T2 to the height of the neighboring conifer hedge will limit the risk of structural failure while maintaining the trees in a safe and manageable form. The proposed pollarding is proportionate and minimal, ensuring the trees continue to contribute to the character and visual amenity of the area, while mitigating the risk posed by potential fungal infection or structural defects.

Demolition of existing buildings and construction of 3no. dwellings and detached carport with associated landscaping, infrastructure and works.

G1 Monterey cypress crown reduction only on the north side, 3 metres in the lower outer crown, 2 metres in the mid outer crown, and up to 1 metre in the upper outer crown, with final cuts not exceeding 50 mm. Breakage occurs within the affected tree crown parts, and G1 is constantly subjected to tensile loads on the opposite side of the compression, as the group is positioned on the windward side of the applied force. G1 targets the house to the north, and there are no restrictions for parking on Douglas Avenue.

Construction of single storey extension to rear.

Variation of condition in relation to P/2022/0468 (Extension and renovation of dwelling. Replacement of attached garage with new detached garage, with annex space above.): Condition P1 - (Approved plans). Variation sought: Detached Garage - i) redesign of internal layout, ii) new window openings - a) additional of rooflight to NE elevation (opaque glass with max 15cm opening -780 x 980 Velux Rooflight : ), b) two triangle shaped windows to NW elevation - first floor level (fixed closed) and c) window to NW elevation - ground floor. iii) removal of window to SE elevation iv) change of position of entrance door on ground floor.