Search Gildersome planning applications
11 applications received or decided in the last 90 days · within 1 km of the centre of Gildersome · updated daily · Leeds City Council
- The Maples 1 Ashwood Gardens Gildersome Morley Leeds LS27 7ASAwaiting decisionRetrospective change of use as a small children's home for up to two childrenReceived 6 Nov 202626/05725/FU
- 737 Whitehall Road Leeds LS12 6JLAwaiting decisionChange of use of attached garage for use as a dog grooming Business, with replacement of garage roller shutter door with a new window and door with brick infillReceived 2 Nov 202626/05834/FU
- 54 Street Lane Gildersome Morley Leeds LS27 7HYRefusedCertificate of Proposed Lawful Development for a single storey rear extensionReceived 29 Sep 2026Decided 21 Oct 202626/05442/CLP
- 7 Suffield Drive Gildersome Morley Leeds LS27 7WDApprovedCertificate of Proposed Lawful Development for the addition of dormer window to the rear; single storey rear extensionReceived 28 Sep 2026Decided 2 Oct 202626/05413/CLP
- 17 Harthill Gildersome Morley Leeds LS27 7EUAwaiting decisionSingle Storey Rear Extension with raised timber decking to rearReceived 28 Sep 202626/05426/FU
Planning in Gildersome
- Approved
- 83%
- 50 of 58 decided
- Decision time
- about 8 weeks
- on average
Applications within 1 km of the centre of Gildersome in the last 24 months, from Leeds City Council's planning register.
Decided by Leeds City CouncilCouncil page
Around Gildersome
Postcode districts
LS27 197 applications in the last 12 monthsLS12 176 applications in the last 12 months
Applications in each district in the last 12 months.
Nearby towns and villages
Planning authority: Leeds City Council
For home projects and trades
- Architects in GildersomeFor planning applications, extensions and new builds.
- Building contractors in GildersomeLocal builders for approved plans and permitted development.
Builders and trades: get new Gildersome jobs that match your work. See Leads
Application types: Rear extensionsLoft conversionsHouseholder applicationsTree works & TPOListed building consentChange of useAnnexes & granny flatsSolar panelsBarn conversionsBasement extensions
About Gildersome
Gildersome is a village and civil parish located in the City of Leeds metropolitan borough, approximately 5 miles (7 km) south-west of Leeds city centre. Nestled within the Heavy Woollen District, this area offers a blend of historical charm and local amenities, making it a noteworthy consideration for planning applications in West Yorkshire. The settlement has a population of approximately 5,830 (2021 estimate). It sits within the Leeds district.
There are currently no active flood warnings for the Gildersome area, indicating a relatively low flood risk at present. This is a positive factor for both existing residents and those considering property purchases or new developments.
In terms of safety, there were no crimes reported in the immediate area during the most recent reporting period (May 2026). This makes Gildersome a particularly low-crime area, which is often reflected in its desirability and property values.
The area around Gildersome has 3 nature designations nearby, which may affect how planning applications are assessed.
For anyone interested in property development or monitoring local planning decisions, Gildersome planning applications can be searched by entering a local postcode above. Results include full application details, decision status, and the ability to track applications over time and set planning alerts to help you monitor and review pending planning applications.
To comment on or object to a planning application near Gildersome, open it in the list above: each one links to the council's own page for it and shows any comment deadline.
In the last 24 months, 72 planning applications were submitted near Gildersome. Of these, 83% were approved, with an average decision time of 58 days.
The most common types were full planning applications (33), discharge of conditions (15), outline applications (6).
2 planning appeals were lodged, of which 0 were allowed and 2 were dismissed (0% success rate).