Search Crumpsall planning applications
19 applications received or decided in the last 90 days · within 1 km of the centre of Crumpsall · updated daily · Manchester City Council
- 15 Belhaven Road, Manchester, M8 4WRAwaiting decisionConversion of the existing garage into a gym, home office and games room ancillary to the main dwellinghouse, including the installation of new anthracite grey windows and doors and anthracite grey external wall cladding.Lawful development: ProposedReceived 26 Oct 2026PLA-2026-001884
- 11 King Edwards Buildings, Bury Old Road, SALFORD, M7 4QJAwaiting decisionChange of use of first and second floor to 1no. self-contained apartment with erection of a metal staircase to provide access, retention of ground floor retail unit and cold room at the rear, and erection of a single-storey rear extensionFull planning permissionReceived 21 Oct 2026PA/2026/0957
- 21A King Edwards Buildings, Bury Old Road, Salford, M7 4QJAwaiting decisionChange of use of first and second floors from commercial storage space (use class B8) to 2no. 1-bedroom self-contained flats (use class C3) with the creation of 2no. cycle parking spacesFull planning permissionReceived 20 Oct 2026PA/2026/0945
- 87 Printon Avenue, Manchester, M9 8JlAwaiting decisionWheelchair ramp to front of property.Full planning permissionReceived 19 Oct 2026PLA-2026-001956
- Southfields Care Home, 111 Crescent Road, Manchester, M8 9WTAwaiting decisionInstallation of modular garden office to rear of existing property.Full planning permissionReceived 16 Oct 2026PLA-2026-001688
Planning in Crumpsall
- Approved
- 84%
- 47 of 54 decided
- Decision time
- about 9 weeks
- on average
Applications within 1 km of the centre of Crumpsall in the last 24 months, from Manchester City Council's planning register.
Decided by Manchester City CouncilCouncil page
Around Crumpsall
Postcode districts
M8 92 applications in the last 12 monthsM9 61 applications in the last 12 monthsM7 71 applications in the last 12 months
Applications in each district in the last 12 months.
Nearby towns and villages
Planning authority: Manchester City Council
For home projects and trades
- Architects in CrumpsallFor planning applications, extensions and new builds.
- Building contractors in CrumpsallLocal builders for approved plans and permitted development.
Builders and trades: get new Crumpsall jobs that match your work. See Leads
Application types: Rear extensionsLoft conversionsHouseholder applicationsTree works & TPOListed building consentChange of useAnnexes & granny flatsSolar panelsBarn conversionsBasement extensions
About Crumpsall
Crumpsall is an outer suburb and electoral ward of Manchester, located approximately 3 miles north of the city centre. Bordered by Cheetham Hill, Blackley, Harpurhey, Broughton, and Prestwich, it had a population of 15,959 as of the 2011 census. Historically part of Lancashire, Crumpsall is notable for housing North Manchester General Hospital, making it a key area for health and community planning applications.
In terms of safety, there were no crimes reported in the immediate area during the most recent reporting period (September 2026). This makes Crumpsall a particularly low-crime area, which is often reflected in its desirability and property values.
For anyone interested in property development or monitoring local planning decisions, Crumpsall planning applications can be searched by entering a local postcode above. Results include full application details, decision status, and the ability to track applications over time and set planning alerts to help you monitor and review pending planning applications.
To comment on or object to a planning application near Crumpsall, open it in the list above: each one links to the council's own page for it and shows any comment deadline.
In the last 24 months, 80 planning applications were submitted near Crumpsall. Of these, 84% were approved, with an average decision time of 65 days.
The most common types were full planning applications (35), discharge of conditions (11), outline applications (9).
1 planning appeal was lodged, of which 0 were allowed and 1 was dismissed (0% success rate).