Single-storey rear extensions in Leeds
Leeds approved 1,109 of the 1,259 planning applications for single-storey rear extensions it decided in the last five years (88%), and the typical decision took 54 days.
Leeds City Council · planning applications received Oct 2021 to Oct 2026 · updated 25 Oct 2026
Approved
1,109 of 1,259
88% of decided applications; 28 withdrawn, 126 undecided
Typical time to a decision
54 days
median, from 1,249 decisions with both dates published
Decided within 8 weeks
943 of 1,249
8 weeks is the usual statutory period; councils can agree extensions
See what was approved near your own address
The The Signal Report shows approvals and refusals for single-storey rear extensions within 250 m, 500 m and 1 km of your home, the council's reasons for refusing similar schemes, your property's planning history and the constraints on the plot. Free preview for any address.
Recent decisions
Single storey rear extension; garage conversion to habitable room space with window replacing garage door to front and new dropped kerb add…
26/03150/FU · decided 23 Oct 2026
Single storey rear extension and infill extension to side to link with garage
26/03095/FU · decided 22 Oct 2026
Demolition of conservatory to rear and erection of single storey rear extension
26/04653/FU · decided 22 Oct 2026
Hip-to-gable roof extension with new rear dormer, single storey rear extension and alterations to replace side door with window
26/04027/FU · decided 22 Oct 2026
4.5m single storey rear extension, 3.2m to ridge height and 2.4m to eaves
26/05234/DHH · decided 19 Oct 2026
Why Leeds refuses single-storey rear extensions
The council's own words, quoted from recent decision notices.
31 Ashgrove Croft Kippax Leeds LS25 7RB
“1) The proposed single-storey rear extension, by virtue of its depth, height and siting immediately adjacent to the shared boundary with 29 Ashgrove Croft would result in an unduly dominant and overbearing form of development. The proposal would create an unacceptable sense of enclosure and adversely affect rear facing windows and rear amenity space, to the detriment of residential amenity. As such the development is contrary to Policy P10 of the Core Strategy (2019), Saved Policies GP5 and BD5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006), Policy HDG2 of the Householder Design Guide (2…”
9 Woodlea Garth Meanwood Leeds LS6 4SG
“If you wish to pursue this matter, you should submit a full planning application: 1) The Local Planning Authority considers that the proposed amendments to the scheme would result in the introduction of white render to a highly prominent elevation of the application property and the installation of a heat pump, which would introduce a noise source that could adversely affect the amenity and living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. Taken together, and when considered in the context of the originally approved scheme, it is considered that the proposed amendments would require a full assessm…”
701 Whitehall Road Leeds LS12 6HB
“1) The Local Planning Authority considers that due to its proximity to the boundary with No. 703, the proposed two-storey side extension will close the gap between the two properties, creating a 'terracing effect' to the detriment of the streetscene, which is characterised by a regular rhythm of semi-detached pairs separated by driveways and garages offering glimpses of open land rising to the south. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy HDG1 of the Householder Design Guide and to Core Strategy policy P10, in addition to saved policies GP5 and BD6 of the UDPRas well as policy within th…”
Other home extensions in Leeds
- Loft conversions
463 of 638 approved (73%)
- Single-storey side extensions
430 of 492 approved (87%)
- Two-storey and first-floor extensions
707 of 939 approved (75%)
How these figures are made
Planning applications Leeds City Council received Oct 2021 to Oct 2026, from the council's public planning register as collected by Planning Signal. An application counts as a single-storey rear extension when its own description says so (rules-based classification, tested against blind labelled samples). Duplicate records of one application are counted once. The approval figure counts approved and refused planning applications only: withdrawn and undecided ones, lawful development certificates and prior approvals are left out. Decision times use the received (or validated) date and the decision date the council published.
Past decisions describe what happened to other applications. They are not a prediction for yours: every application is decided on its own design and the council's current policies.