Skip to content

22/00818/FUL

Full application at Pavement Opposite 31-53 Lichfield Street Wolverhampton WV1 1EQ, Wolverhampton. View planning documents, track the decision and get email alerts on updates.

Enriching application data
2/3
Council recordsAppealsFlood risk
Permitted
Loading…

Proposed removal of 2no. BT kiosk phone boxes. With installation of 1no. new BT Street Hub, incorporating 2no. 75" LCD internally illuminated digital advertisement screens, also providing telephone capabilities and other digital services for public use.

22/00818/FUL

Small
Full

Pavement Opposite 31-53 Lichfield Street Wolverhampton WV1 1EQ

Submitted17 Jul
Validated
Consultation
Target
Decided14 Apr
6 weeks typical decision time in Wolverhampton93% of full applications approved

This is a full planning application for signage at Pavement Opposite 31-53 Lichfield Street Wolverhampton WV1 1EQ. Wolverhampton has handled 1,040 applications of this type and approves 93% of them, typically deciding them in 50 days. This one was decided in 271 days, 32 weeks longer than Wolverhampton's median. The site is in a conservation area. There has been 1 other application at this address. In the past year there have been 53 applications across St Peters. We hold 649 applications in total for the WV1 postcode area.

Track this application

Get email alerts when there is a planning decision or status change.

Get email alerts near WV1

New planning applications delivered to your inbox weekly.

Application Details

Reference
22/00818/FUL
Address
Pavement Opposite 31-53 Lichfield Street Wolverhampton WV1 1EQ
Postcode
WV1 1EQ
Local Authority
Wolverhampton
Application Type
Full
Scale / Size
Small
Decision Status
Permitted

Applicant & Agent

Planning Application Dates

Date Decided
14 April 2023
Date Submitted
17 July 2022

Planning Decision

Publicity

Appeal

Additional Information

Coordinates
52.586723, -2.125135

Appeal History

3304856
Dismissed
Type: Householder (HAS)Procedure: Written RepresentationsDecision: 25 January 2023Dev Type: Householder developmentsReason: Refusal

Source: Wolverhampton