Northwood, HA6 2XQ

1. 1.The English oak is situated in the rear garden of 87 Myrtleside Close and is visible from neighbouring properties as well as from Rickmansworth Road, where it occupies a prominent position in the local landscape. The tree is mature and appears to be in fair condition, although reduced leaf coverage was noted during the site visit. The limb failure referenced in the application was also observed and is consistent with the applicant's concerns. Despite signs of decline, the tree retains a high amenity value due to its size, visibility, and contribution to the character of the area. Its presence enhances the green infrastructure and provides ecological and visual benefits. The oak's stature and location make it a significant feature within the surrounding environment, and its retention in good condition is desirable from both an arboricultural and public amenity perspective. This application has been refused. The proposed crown reduction of seven metres is considered too severe and disproportionate to the issues identified. There is no supporting evidence, such as a climbing inspection or resistograph test, to justify such extensive works. Limb failure can result from a range of factors including wind loading, structural defects, or summer limb drop, and does not in itself warrant a heavy reduction without further investigation. Reducing the crown by seven metres at this stage may accelerate the tree's decline and negatively impact its long-term health and structure. If the applicant is concerned about the risk of repeated limb failure, a more targeted approach would be appropriate. This could include a moderate reduction to specific limbs or further diagnostic assessments to inform future management. A revised application supported by evidence may be considered more favourably. Having regard to the reasons given for the proposed work, the work is unjustified and may have a detrimental impact on the visual amenity and arboreal character of the area, and on the long term health of the tree.
2. 2.The removal of deadwood, dangerous / hanging branches and ivy: This does not require the formal consent of the Council.
3. 3.Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981: Note that it is an offence under this act to disturb roosting bats, nesting birds or any other protected species. Therefore, if applicable, it is advisable to consult your tree surgeon / consultant to agree an acceptable time for carrying out the approved works.
4. 4.Owner(s)'s permission: Permission should be sought from the owner(s) of the tree(s) and / or the owner(s) of the land that the tree(s) overhang prior to any approved work being carried out.
5. 5.Expected standard of tree work: The approved works must be carried out in accordance with the conditions laid out above. If they are not, then enforcement action could being taken which could lead to prosecution and heavy fines. Therefore, it is highly recommended that the works are only carried out by a professional and competent arboriculturist who undertakes to comply with the conditions of this consent and in accordance with industry best practice (BS 3998:2010). The Arboricultural Association can provide details of its approved contractors, who have demonstrated such professionalism and Council can provide a list of contractors who are known to carry out tree work to a good standard and to normally maintain an appropriate policy of indemnity insurance. Address: 3 North, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED) THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (TREE PRESERVATION)(ENGLAND)REGULATIONS 2012 Tree Preservation Order No.

From the council's decision notice.

Postcode

HA6 2XQ

Application type

Tree works: Trees in conservation areas/subject to TPOs