Wakes Colne Lodge, Lower Green, Wakes Colne Colchester CO6 2AZ
Refused on 15 June 2026
Council decision: Refuse1 reason for refusal
Boundary © HM Land Registry, © Ordnance Survey · details
This information is subject to Crown copyright and database rights 2026 and is reproduced with the permission of HM Land Registry. The polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x, y co-ordinates) are subject to Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey AC0000851063. Conditions of use.
Proposal
Demolition of single storey rear lean to element. Part two storey, part single storey rear extension. New garage. Relocated vehicle entrance. New front boundary wall and gate.
- Received
- 20 April 2026
- Council
- Colchester City Council
- Ward
- Rural North
- ReceivedReceived20 Apr
- ValidatedValidated20 Apr
- Consult.Consultation16 May
- TargetTarget Date15 Jun
- DecidedDecided15 Jun
Decided in 56 days (council typically 56)
About this application
This is a full planning application for demolition at Wakes Colne Lodge, Lower Green, Wakes Colne Colchester CO6 2AZ. Colchester has handled 3,122 applications of this type. This one was decided in 56 days. The site is in 1 listed building nearby. There has been 1 other application at this address. In the past year there have been 115 applications across Rural North. We hold 2,522 applications in total for the CO6 postcode area.
84% of full applications at Colchester City Council were approved. Across all application types, the council typically decides in about 8 weeks (median).
Based on decided applications received in the last 3 years.See what's approved near your address
Why it was refused
- The proposed first floor and rear extensions, by virtue of their scale, massing and design, would fail to appear subordinate to the host dwelling. In particular, the ridge height of the first floor extension would match that of the existing dwelling, resulting in an overly dominant and expansive form that would not respect the proportions of the original building. The overall bulk of the extensions, when viewed cumulatively, would appear excessive and would erode the established form and composition of the host dwelling. Furthermore, the design approach, including the introduction of contrasting materials such as white render at first floor level, would appear incongruous and uncharacteristic of the existing dwelling. The proposal would read as a separate, competing built form rather than a subservient addition. From the side elevation in particular, the extension would appear overly expansive and dominant, failing to complement the character and appearance of the existing dwelling. Given the open nature of the site, the proposals would be highly visible from the public realm, including views from Lower Green Lane, thereby exacerbating their harmful visual impact. As a result, the development would appear prominent, obtrusive and incongruous within the street scene. The proposal would therefore result in an unacceptably harmful IMPORTANT – ATTENTION IS DRAWN TO THE NOTES ATTACHED DC1001MWD impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling, the surrounding area and countryside. The scale, massing and design of the development would fail to respect local character and would not represent high- quality design. As such, the proposal would be contrary to the following policies of the adopted local development framework: i) Policy DM13 of the local plan (2017-2033) (Adopted July 2022) which states that that residential alterations and extensions must be compatible with the scale, appearance and character of the original dwelling including taking into account the cumulative impact of such development. (ii) Policy SP7 of the Local Plan (2017-2033) (Adopted July 2022) which states that new development must meet the highest standards of urban architecture design and respond positively to local character and context. (iii) Policy DM15 of the Section 2 Local Plan (2017-2033) (Adopted July 2022)which states that all development, including extensions, must be designed to a high standard, positively respond to its context and achieve good standards of amenity. It also states that poor design will be refused including that which fails to take the opportunity for good design or improving the local area. iv) The proposal also fails to meet objectives of Government policy in paragraph 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2023) which states that all developments should be visually attractive as a result of good architecture and layout as well as being sympathetic to the local character and history including the surrounding built environment.
From the council's decision notice.
Application details
- Postcode
- CO6 2AZ
- Application type
- Full (8 Week Determination)
- Scale / size
- Small
- Parish
- Wakes Colne
Planning application dates
- Date validated
- 20 April 2026
- Consultation expiry
- 16 May 2026
- Consultation end
- 16 May 2026
- Target decision date
- 15 June 2026
Planning decision
- Case officer
- Sakeena El-Diwany
- Statutory period
- 56 days
Appeal
- Appeal result
- l
Additional information
- UPRN
- 100091242929
Site constraints
Designations that overlap or adjoin the site outline.
- Flood zone 1: Low probability (rivers and sea)
Not published by this council, so not checked: Article 4 directions. Ask the council if these matter.
Also checked, none recorded (23)
flood storage areas, conservation areas, listed buildings, tree preservation orders, green belt, scheduled monuments, World Heritage Sites, World Heritage Site buffer zones, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields, Heritage at Risk entries, nutrient neutrality catchments, national parks, National Landscapes, SSSIs, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas, Ramsar sites, ancient woodland, national nature reserves, local nature reserves, heritage coasts and brownfield registers.
A guide only, from official open data; it is not a planning search. Flood zones cover rivers and sea, not surface water.
Data © Crown copyright and others · sources and licences
Contains public sector information from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG and local planning authorities), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
© Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. The Historic England GIS Data contained in this material was obtained on 2026-11-03. The most publicly available up to date Historic England GIS Data can be obtained from HistoricEngland.org.uk.
© Natural England copyright. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
© Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2026. All rights reserved. Flood Map for Planning, Open Government Licence v3.0.
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
Planning history at this site
2 other applications at this property, newest first.
Source: Colchester
Track this application
Get email alerts when there is a planning decision or status change.
Get email alerts near CO6
New planning applications delivered to your inbox daily.
Around this site
Nearby applications
- Wakes Colne Lodge, Lower Green, Wakes Colne Colchester CO6 2AZ232074 · FullRefused0.0 mi
- Bazaros, Middle Green, Wakes Colne Colchester CO6 2BN240455 · FullApproved0.2 mi
- Georgeons, Parkhurst Green Lane, Wakes Colne Colchester CO6 2BL260319 · FullRefused0.2 mi
- Ivy Green Farm, Middle Green, Wakes Colne Colchester CO6 2BJ241872 · FullApproved0.3 mi
- Loveneys, Middle Green, Wakes Colne Essex CO6 2BJ242048 · ConditionsAwaiting decision0.3 mi
For applicants and trades
Contractors near this project
Find contractors for extensions near this site- A B Electrical Contractors LtdElectrician0.4 mi
- Richardson Landscape Construction LtdDrive & Patio ContractorsFence Installers1.6 mi
- Sidmar Electrical LtdElectrician2.0 mi
- Sibley Electrical LtdElectrician2.3 mi
What's been approved on your street?
See what the council approved and refused near this address for the project you have in mind, and the rules that apply here.
Get The Signal Report