Skip to content

Site At Brook Farm Riding Stables Stock Road Stock Ingatestone Essex

25/01156/OUTOutlineRefused
Outline / PiP

Refused on 17 February 2026

1 reason for refusal

Approximate site (title boundary)
Boundary © HM Land Registry, © Ordnance Survey · details

This information is subject to Crown copyright and database rights 2026 and is reproduced with the permission of HM Land Registry. The polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x, y co-ordinates) are subject to Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey AC0000851063. Conditions of use.

Proposal

Outline application for the construction of 8 new dwellings. All matters reserved.

Received
24 October 2025
  1. Received24 Oct
  2. Validated
  3. Consult.28 Nov
  4. Target19 Dec
  5. Decided17 Feb

Decided in 116 days (council typically 49)

About this application

This is an outline application at Site At Brook Farm Riding Stables Stock Road Stock Ingatestone Essex. Chelmsford has handled 370 applications of this type. This one was decided in 116 days, 10 weeks longer than Chelmsford's typical decision time. There has been 1 other application at this address.

67% of outline applications at Chelmsford City Council were approved. Across all application types, the council typically decides in about 7 weeks (median).

Based on decided applications received in the last 3 years.Planning something similar? See what gets approved on your street

Why it was refused

  1. Reason 1 The site is located within the Metropolitan Green Belt where National and local planning policies severely restrict new development and the construction of new buildings. Chapter 13 of the National Planning Policy Framework relates to protecting Green Belt land. It sets out the purposes of the Green Belt and the limited forms of development that may be considered appropriate. Strategic Policy S11 of the Chelmsford Local Plan states that the openness and permanence of the Green Belt will be protected. Inappropriate development will not be approved except in very special circumstances. Paragraph 155 of the NPPF states that the development of homes, commercial and other development in the Green Belt should not be regarded as inappropriate where: a.) The development would utilise grey belt land and would not fundamentally undermine the purposes (taken together) of the remaining Green Belt across the area of the plan; b.) There is a demonstrable unmet need for the type of development proposed; c.) The development would be in a sustainable location. d.) Where applicable, the development proposed meets the 'Golden Rules' set out in paragraphs 156-157. For the purposes of decision-making, Grey Belt is defined as 'land in the Green Belt comprising previously developed land and/or any other land that, in either case, does not strongly contribute to any of purposes (a), (b), or (d) in paragraph 143. 'Grey belt' excludes land where the application of the policies relating to WEB PBCS090 25/01156/OUT REOUTZ the areas or assets in footnote 7 (other than Green Belt) would provide a strong reason for refusing or restricting development.' The application site strongly contributes to purpose (a) of paragraph 143 of the NPPF. It is free from the existing development and forms part of the wider open and undeveloped countryside. Furthermore, the site is near to the large built-up area of Billericay town. The site forms part of land that spatially and visually separates the defined limits of Billericay and the wider Green Belt. The proposal would represent fringe development that would contribute to urban sprawl of a large built-up area to the detriment of the Green Belt and in conflict with its purposes. The site is therefore not Grey Belt and does not constitute appropriate development under paragraph 155 of the NPPF. Furthermore, as a major development site in the context of the NPPF, it has not been demonstrated, with clear and robust evidence, that the proposal meets the corresponding requirements of paragraph 156 of the NPPF, in particular the provision of affordable housing and local green space. The development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt. Paragraph 153 of the NPPF states that inappropriate development is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved except in very special circumstances. There are no very special circumstances that outweigh the harm caused to the Green Belt. The development is therefore unacceptable in principle and conflicts with Chapter 13 of the National Planning Policy Framework and Strategic Policy S11 of the Chelmsford Local Plan. Reason 2 Paragraph 142 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence. Paragraph 153 of the NPPF states that when considering any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt, including harm to its openness. Strategic Policy S11 of the Chelmsford Local Plan states that the openness and permanence of the Green Belt will be protected. The development would materially impact on the openness of the Green Belt through the presence of built form on what is currently an undeveloped and open site. Through the construction of eight new dwellings in addition to garages, an i

From the council's decision notice.

Application details

Application type
Outline
Scale / size
Small

Planning application dates

Validated
24 October 2025
Consultation expiry
28 November 2025
Consultation end
28 November 2025
Target decision date
19 December 2025

Planning decision

Statutory period
56 days

Additional information

Planning Portal ID
PP-14226429
Documents
13

Site constraints

Checking the site
2/3
Council recordsAppealsFlood risk

Designations that overlap or adjoin the site outline.

  • Green belt: Chelmsford
  • Flood zone 1: Low probability (rivers and sea)

Possibly incomplete for this council: tree preservation orders.

Also checked, none recorded (22)

flood storage areas, conservation areas, listed buildings, Article 4 directions, scheduled monuments, World Heritage Sites, World Heritage Site buffer zones, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields, Heritage at Risk entries, nutrient neutrality catchments, national parks, National Landscapes, SSSIs, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas, Ramsar sites, ancient woodland, national nature reserves, local nature reserves, heritage coasts and brownfield registers.

A guide only, from official open data; it is not a planning search. Flood zones cover rivers and sea, not surface water.

Data © Crown copyright and others · sources and licences

Contains public sector information from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG and local planning authorities), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

© Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. The Historic England GIS Data contained in this material was obtained on 2026-11-03. The most publicly available up to date Historic England GIS Data can be obtained from HistoricEngland.org.uk.

© Natural England copyright. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

© Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2026. All rights reserved. Flood Map for Planning, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source: Chelmsford

Track this application

Get email alerts when there is a planning decision or status change.

Around this site

For applicants and trades

Planning something similar?

See what the council approved and refused for new homes on your street. Pick your home and get the evidence before you pay for drawings.