Skip to content

920 Pershore Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 7PU

2026/03625/PAFull PlanningRefused
Full

Refused on 11 September 2026

Council decision: REFUSE5 reasons for refusal

Approximate location: the centre of the postcode, not the exact property.

Proposal

Change of use from restaurant ancillary use into self-contained unit

Received
30 June 2026
Ward
Bournbrook & Selly Park
  1. Received30 Jun
  2. Validated30 Jun
  3. Consult.
  4. Target
  5. Decided11 Sep

Decided in 73 days (council typically 56)

About this application

This is a planning application for a change of use at 920 Pershore Road,Selly Oak,Birmingham ,B29 7PU. Birmingham has handled 198 applications of this type. This one was decided in 43 days, 13 days quicker than Birmingham's typical decision time. The site is in 1 listed building nearby. There are no previous applications recorded at this address. In the past year there have been 105 applications across Bournbrook & Selly Park. We hold 1,066 applications in total for the B29 postcode area.

77% of full planning applications at Birmingham City Council were approved. Across all application types, the council typically decides in about 8 weeks (median).

Based on decided applications received in the last 3 years.Planning something similar? See what gets approved on your street

Why it was refused

  1. The proposed development would fail to provide an acceptable standard of accommodation for future occupiers. The development would provide approximately 43m² of gross internal floor space, which falls below the 50m² minimum standard for a one-bedroom, two-person dwelling as set out in the Nationally Described Space Standard. Furthermore, the habitable room windows would have a direct outlook towards a blank wall at a separation distance of approximately 4 metres, resulting in poor levels of outlook, limited natural light and an unduly oppressive living environment. Collectively, these deficiencies would result in cramped and substandard living conditions and would fail to secure a high standard of residential amenity for future occupiers. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies PG3 and TP27 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Policies DM2 and DM10 of the Development Management in Birmingham DPD, the Birmingham Design Guide SPD, and the National Planning Policy Framework.
  2. Insufficient information has been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed accommodation would achieve the minimum 2.3m floor-to-ceiling height required to provide an acceptable standard of living conditions for future occupiers. As such, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that the proposal would provide high quality residential accommodation and the scheme is therefore contrary to the Birmingham Design Guide SPD 2022, Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan 2017, Policies DM2 and DM10 of the Development Management in Birmingham DPD 2021 and the National Planning Policy Framework.
  3. The proposed residential unit fails to provide adequate accommodation for future occupiers by reason of the absence of a kitchen and associated food preparation facilities. Consequently, the development would not provide the facilities necessary for day-to-day living and would fail to achieve an acceptable standard of residential accommodation. The proposal would therefore result in substandard living conditions, contrary to Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Policy DM10 of the Development Management in Birmingham DPD and the National Planning Policy Framework.
  4. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed residential unit would provide an acceptable standard of living conditions for future occupiers. Insufficient information has been submitted to assess the impact of noise and odour arising from the operation of the adjoining restaurant use. In the absence of a satisfactory noise and odour assessment, the Local Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that future occupiers would not be subject to unacceptable levels of noise and odour disturbance. The proposal would therefore fail to provide a satisfactory level of residential amenity and is contrary to Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Policies DM1 and DM2 of the Development Management in Birmingham DPD and the National Planning Policy Framework.
  5. The proposed development fails to demonstrate that safe and suitable vehicular access can be achieved. The submitted plans show an access gate of insufficient width to provide the required pedestrian visibility splays and fail to identify the precise location of the existing footway crossing to demonstrate that the access can operate safely. Furthermore, the proposal fails to provide secure and covered cycle parking in accordance with adopted parking standards. Consequently, the proposal would be detrimental to highway safety and would fail to meet the operational parking and sustainable transport requirements of the development. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies DM14 and DM15 of the Development Management in Birmingham DPD, and the National Planning Policy Framework.

From the council's decision notice.

Application details

Postcode
B29 7PU
Application type
Full Planning

Planning application dates

Date validated
30 June 2026

Applicant and agent

Applicant
Private applicant

Planning decision

Case officer
Mohammed Abdellah

Site constraints

Checking the site
2/3
Council recordsAppealsFlood risk

Designations at the address point. Ones next to the site may also apply.

  • Article 4 direction: City Wide Hmo+1 more
  • Flood zone 1: Low probability (rivers and sea)
Also checked, none recorded (23)

flood storage areas, conservation areas, listed buildings, tree preservation orders, green belt, scheduled monuments, World Heritage Sites, World Heritage Site buffer zones, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields, Heritage at Risk entries, nutrient neutrality catchments, national parks, National Landscapes, SSSIs, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas, Ramsar sites, ancient woodland, national nature reserves, local nature reserves, heritage coasts and brownfield registers.

A guide only, from official open data; it is not a planning search. Flood zones cover rivers and sea, not surface water.

Data © Crown copyright and others · sources and licences

Contains public sector information from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG and local planning authorities), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

© Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. The Historic England GIS Data contained in this material was obtained on 2026-11-03. The most publicly available up to date Historic England GIS Data can be obtained from HistoricEngland.org.uk.

© Natural England copyright. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

© Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2026. All rights reserved. Flood Map for Planning, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source: Birmingham

Track this application

Get email alerts when there is a planning decision or status change.

Get email alerts near B29

New planning applications delivered to your inbox daily.

Around this site

For applicants and trades

Planning something similar?

See what the council approved and refused for changes of use on your street. Pick your home and get the evidence before you pay for drawings.