Skip to content

Outside The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Bristol Road South Birmingham B31

2026/02404/PATelecommunications DeterminationRefused
Prior approval

Proposal

Application for a prior notification for the installation of 20m high telecommunications mast with associated antennas, transmission dishes, equipment cabinets and ancillary development worksApplication for a prior notification for the installation of 20m high telecommunications mast with associated antennas, transmission dishes, equipment cabinets and ancillary development works

Received
30 April 2026
Decided
18 June 2026 · PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIRED AND TO REFUSE
Ward
Northfield
The council did not publish a location for this application.
  1. Received30 Apr
  2. Validated30 Apr
  3. Consult.
  4. Target
  5. Decided18 Jun

Decided in 49 days (council typically 56)

8 weeks typical decision time in Birmingham86% of telecoms applications approvedSee what's approved near your address

This is a telecoms application at Outside The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Bristol Road South Birmingham B31. Birmingham has handled 763 applications of this type and approves 87% of them, typically deciding them in 25 days. This one was decided in 49 days, 3 weeks longer than Birmingham's median. There are no previous applications recorded at this address. In the past year there have been 30 applications across Northfield.

Application Details

Reference
2026/02404/PA
Address
Outside The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Bristol Road South Birmingham B31
Local Authority
Birmingham
Application Type
Telecommunications Determination
Scale / Size
Small
Decision Status
Rejected
Current Status
Decided
Ward
Northfield
District
Northfield

Applicant & Agent

Architect ProfilePERRY WILLIAMS LTD

Planning Application Dates

Date Received
30 April 2026
Date Decided
18 June 2026
Date Validated
30 April 2026
Date Submitted
30 April 2026
Application Expires
24 June 2026

Planning Decision

Decision
PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIRED AND TO REFUSE
Case Officer
Jacqueline Hughes
Statutory Period
50 days

Why it was refused

  1. By virtue of its size, siting and design the proposed telecommunications equipment would be exposed and prominent in the street scene to the detriment of visual amenity and materially harm the character and appearance of the area. As such the proposal would be contrary to Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Policies DM2 and DM16 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document, Design Principle 24 of the Birmingham Design Guide, and the National Planning Policy Framework.
  2. The proposed telecommunications equipment would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the adjacent Grade II Listed Building, known as Woodlands, which forms part of the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital by virtue of its siting, appearance, size and design. In addition, the proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the setting of this listed building and the public benefits of the proposal are not considered sufficient to outweigh the identified harm to this heritage asset. As such the proposal would be contrary to Policies PG3 and TP12 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Policies DM2 and DM16 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document, Design Principle 24 of the Birmingham Design Guide, and the National Planning Policy Framework.

From the council's decision notice.

Publicity

Appeal

Additional Information

Source: Birmingham

Track this application

Get email alerts when there is a planning decision or status change.

What's been approved on your street?

See what the council approved and refused near this address for the project you have in mind, and the rules that apply here.

Get The Signal Report