Skip to content

31 Jumpers Avenue Christchurch BH23 2EP

P/26/00840/FULFull Planning PermissionRefused
Full

Refused on 7 May 2026

Delegated (officer decision)6 reasons for refusal

Approximate location: the centre of the postcode, not the exact property.

Proposal

Demolition of existing garage and new build 3 bed house

Received
26 February 2026
Decision level
Delegated (officer decision)
Ward
Commons
  1. Received26 Feb
  2. Validated2 Mar
  3. Consult.30 Apr
  4. Target
  5. Decided7 May

Decided in 66 days (council typically 63)

About this application

This is a full planning application for demolition at 31 Jumpers Avenue Christchurch BH23 2EP. BCP has handled 4,721 applications of this type. This one was decided in 70 days, 7 days longer than BCP's typical decision time. There are no previous applications recorded at this address. In the past year there have been 130 applications across Commons. We hold 3,215 applications in total for the BH23 postcode area.

86% of full applications at Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council were approved. Across all application types, the council typically decides in about 9 weeks (median).

Based on decided applications received in the last 3 years.Planning something similar? See what gets approved on your street

Why it was refused

  1. The applicant has (1) failed to provide a properly controlled car parking within the plot, without which such will likely lead to overparking, that such creating conditions prejudicial to the highway safety of all users, on and off site; (2) has failed to provide practical access arrangements to the rear cycle stores, by reason of the substandard path widths to such; as well it having (3) failed to demonstrate that the widened access needed will not result in harm to the health of a highway tree. The open forecourt development represents poor design and is contrary to Policies HE2 and KS12 of the Christchurch Core Strategy (April 2014), the Parking Standards SPD (2021) and NPPF (2024).
  2. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the works undertaken to create the proposal would not harm the highway tree. Therefore, the development is contrary to Policy HE2, whereby development would be permitted if its compatible or improves its surroundings in relationship to mature trees, and Policy HE3, whereby proposals need to demonstrate that natural features such as trees, have been taken into account where development needs to protect and enhance the landscape character of the area of the Christchurch Core Strategy (April 2014).
  3. It is considered the development would be harmful to the designated Dorset Heathlands SPA (Special Protection Area), Ramsar Site and Dorset Heaths SAC (Special Area of Conservation). The failure to make an appropriate contribution towards mitigation measures would have an adverse effect on the integrity of the sites and is therefore considered to be contrary to Policy ME2 of the Christchurch Core Strategy (2014) and the Dorset Heathlands Planning Framework 2020-2025 supplementary Planning Document (March 2020).
  4. It is considered the development would be harmful to the safeguard of New Forest designated sites from recreational related impacts. It cannot therefore be ruled out beyond all reasonable scientific doubt that the proposed development would not have an adverse effect on the New Forest designated sites, either alone or in combination with other proposals. Taking a precautionary approach, it is therefore considered that the proposal would be contrary to Section 63 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.
  5. The site, by reason of its location, will result in waste water generated by the new residential development creating an additional phosphate load in the River Avon, which could harm the water quality of the River Avon SAC, a European Designated Site. There would be a Likely Significant Effect from the proposed development and in the absence of mitigation, it would not be possible to conclude that there would not be an adverse effect on the integrity of the River Avon SAC. The proposal is likely, alone or in combination with other projects, to have an adverse effect on the ecological integrity of the River Avon SAC. The proposals are therefore contrary to Policy ME1 of Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Part 1 - Core Strategy (2014).
  6. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient evidence to satisfy the local planning authority that the proposed development would meet the definition of self-build/custom house building as set out within the Biodiversity Gain Requirements (Exemptions) Regulations 2024 and Section 1(A1) of the Self Build and Custom House building Act 2015 and therefore, the local planning authority cannot be confident that the statutory biodiversity gain condition would not apply. Consequently, the local planning authority cannot be confident that the proposed development would comply with the requirements of Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and Schedule 14 of the Environment Act 2021.

From the council's decision notice.

Application details

Postcode
BH23 2EP
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Scale / size
Small
Parish
Christchurch Town Council

Planning application dates

Date validated
2 March 2026
Consultation expiry
30 April 2026
Consultation start
2 April 2026
Consultation end
30 April 2026

Applicant and agent

Agent address
54 The Grove Christchurch BH23 2HB

Additional information

Documents
21

Site constraints

Checking the site
2/3
Council recordsAppealsFlood risk

Designations at the address point. Ones next to the site may also apply.

  • Flood zone 1: Low probability (rivers and sea)

Not published by this council, so not checked: Article 4 directions. Ask the council if these matter.

Possibly incomplete for this council: tree preservation orders.

Also checked, none recorded (22)

flood storage areas, conservation areas, listed buildings, green belt, scheduled monuments, World Heritage Sites, World Heritage Site buffer zones, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields, Heritage at Risk entries, nutrient neutrality catchments, national parks, National Landscapes, SSSIs, Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas, Ramsar sites, ancient woodland, national nature reserves, local nature reserves, heritage coasts and brownfield registers.

A guide only, from official open data; it is not a planning search. Flood zones cover rivers and sea, not surface water.

Data © Crown copyright and others · sources and licences

Contains public sector information from planning.data.gov.uk (MHCLG and local planning authorities), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

© Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. The Historic England GIS Data contained in this material was obtained on 2026-11-03. The most publicly available up to date Historic England GIS Data can be obtained from HistoricEngland.org.uk.

© Natural England copyright. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

© Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2026. All rights reserved. Flood Map for Planning, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.

Source: BCP

Track this application

Get email alerts when there is a planning decision or status change.

Get email alerts near BH23

New planning applications delivered to your inbox daily.

Around this site

For applicants and trades

Planning something similar?

See what the council approved and refused for new homes on your street. Pick your home and get the evidence before you pay for drawings.