Slowest Planning Councils in England
Which councils take the longest to decide planning applications? Average decision times ranked from slowest to fastest.
Data covers the most recent 24-month period. Rankings are based on 200 councils that meet minimum data thresholds for statistical significance. Last updated 14 May 2026.
| # | Council | Avg Days | Median Days | Total Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newry Mourne Down | 243 | 231 | 170 |
| 2 | Lisburn and Castlereagh | 133 | 99 | 126 |
| 3 | Armagh Banbridge Craigavon | 116 | 91 | 171 |
| 4 | Stafford | 115 | 95 | 338 |
| 5 | Causeway and Glens | 108 | 76 | 316 |
| 6 | Loch Lomond | 108 | 84 | 69 |
| 7 | Belfast | 106 | 83 | 329 |
| 8 | Moray | 104 | 81 | 145 |
| 9 | Derry and Strabane | 104 | 75 | 176 |
| 10 | High Peak | 101 | 71 | 149 |
| 11 | Scarborough | 99 | 86 | 169 |
| 12 | Glasgow | 99 | 85 | 644 |
| 13 | Antrim and Newtownabbey | 98 | 84 | 236 |
| 14 | Mid Ulster | 97 | 89 | 175 |
| 15 | Bridgend | 96 | 72 | 159 |
| 16 | Ards and North Down | 96 | 71 | 259 |
| 17 | East Staffordshire | 92 | 74 | 437 |
| 18 | Havant | 92 | 75 | 243 |
| 19 | Orkney | 90 | 82 | 78 |
| 20 | Hammersmith and Fulham | 88 | 69 | 406 |
| 21 | Rother | 87 | 74 | 303 |
| 22 | Rochford | 86 | 69 | 233 |
| 23 | Barnsley | 85 | 68 | 191 |
| 24 | Thanet | 85 | 61 | 389 |
| 25 | Conwy | 85 | 69 | 185 |
| 26 | Hinckley and Bosworth | 84 | 56 | 196 |
| 27 | Great Yarmouth | 84 | 70 | 258 |
| 28 | East Dunbartonshire | 83 | 64 | 170 |
| 29 | Rossendale | 82 | 66 | 86 |
| 30 | Staffordshire Moorlands | 82 | 65 | 165 |
| 31 | Guildford | 82 | 60 | 847 |
| 32 | North Warwickshire | 82 | 60 | 261 |
| 33 | Newport | 80 | 62 | 316 |
| 34 | Bassetlaw | 80 | 62 | 289 |
| 35 | Oldham | 80 | 62 | 271 |
| 36 | Wakefield | 80 | 61 | 396 |
| 37 | Leicester | 80 | 65 | 404 |
| 38 | West Northamptonshire | 79 | 62 | 1495 |
| 39 | Snowdonia | 79 | 62 | 170 |
| 40 | Richmondshire | 78 | 59 | 228 |
| 41 | Torfaen | 78 | 54 | 186 |
| 42 | Wrexham | 78 | 62 | 195 |
| 43 | West Suffolk | 77 | 56 | 1035 |
| 44 | Angus | 77 | 62 | 196 |
| 45 | Fenland | 77 | 62 | 407 |
| 46 | Elmbridge | 76 | 66 | 258 |
| 47 | Pembrokeshire | 76 | 60 | 411 |
| 48 | Pembroke Coast | 76 | 56 | 231 |
| 49 | Rushcliffe | 76 | 62 | 328 |
| 50 | Yorkshire Dales | 76 | 56 | 215 |
Planning Decision Timescales
Local planning authorities in England are expected to determine most planning applications within statutory timescales: 8 weeks for minor and householder applications, and 13 weeks for major applications. Extensions of time can be agreed with applicants, and complex applications may take considerably longer.
Decision speed is a key performance indicator monitored by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. Councils that consistently fail to meet targets may face designation as underperforming, potentially leading to applications being submitted directly to the Planning Inspectorate.
Factors contributing to slow decision times include staffing pressures, the complexity of applications, environmental constraints requiring specialist consultation, political sensitivity, and workload backlogs. Rural councils with smaller planning teams can be particularly affected.
Average vs Median Decision Times
The median decision time is often a better indicator of typical performance than the average (mean). A small number of very slow applications - such as major developments requiring environmental impact assessment or applications held in abeyance - can significantly inflate average figures.
We include both metrics to give a more complete picture. A large gap between average and median suggests the presence of outlier applications that are distorting the average.